<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Leadership VoicesOverlooking “Capability” for “Like-ability” | Leadership Voices</title>
	<atom:link href="http://leadershipvoices.com/2015/03/27/overlooking-capability-for-like-ability/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://leadershipvoices.com</link>
	<description>Legacy Leadership Principles For Today And Those That You Are Leading</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Sep 2019 12:45:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">79463028</site>		<item>
		<title>Overlooking “Capability”  for “Like-ability” </title>
		<link>http://leadershipvoices.com/2015/03/27/overlooking-capability-for-like-ability/</link>
		<comments>http://leadershipvoices.com/2015/03/27/overlooking-capability-for-like-ability/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2015 11:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Bowser</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Accountability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leadership Skills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leadership Styles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leadership Traits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mentoring]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leadershipvoices.com/?p=8666</guid>

				<description><![CDATA[<p>One of the biggest problem that I see in many organizations is our willingness to overlook “capability” for “like-ability.” What does that mean? It means that many times we are more interested in whether or not our leader is “like-able” and less interested in whether or not they are actually capable of exhibiting and demonstrating [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="http://leadershipvoices.com/2015/03/27/overlooking-capability-for-like-ability/">Overlooking “Capability”  for “Like-ability” </a> first appeared on <a href="http://leadershipvoices.com">Leadership Voices</a>.</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the biggest problem that I see in many organizations is our willingness to overlook “capability” for “like-ability.” What does that mean? It means that many times we are more interested in whether or not our leader is “like-able” and less interested in whether or not they are actually capable of exhibiting and demonstrating [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="http://leadershipvoices.com/2015/03/27/overlooking-capability-for-like-ability/">Overlooking “Capability”  for “Like-ability” </a> first appeared on <a href="http://leadershipvoices.com">Leadership Voices</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	

		<wfw:commentRss>http://leadershipvoices.com/2015/03/27/overlooking-capability-for-like-ability/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">8666</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>